OPay Secures Courtroom Order To Freeze Prospects Accounts With Different Banks


OPay has secured a courtroom order to limit its prospects’ accounts throughout 30 totally different banks.


PoliticalNews Nigeria experiences that OPay, a number one fintech agency backed by Chinese language funding, has been compelled to take authorized motion following a system glitch that allowed prospects to make card funds with out being debited, accumulating a debt of ₦714 million.


This incident occurred between December 10, 2023, and March 4, 2024, and prompted the corporate to hunt judicial intervention to get well the misplaced funds.



This Nigeria information platform understands that OPay obtained approval from the Federal Excessive Courtroom in Lagos to freeze buyer {bank} accounts throughout 30 totally different banks as part of its restoration course of.


The courtroom’s determination got here after OPay filed an affidavit of urgency alongside its utility, resulting in an order granted on June 28, 2024, to limit the affected accounts.


The glitch stemmed from a difficulty with the transaction categorization system utilized by {financial} establishments. Usually, transactions are marked with particular codes indicating their standing — profitable, pending, or failed. For OPay, ‘RC 09’ represents a pending transaction that ought to not end in a buyer debit.


Nonetheless, on account of an oversight by the Switching Firm, Interswitch, which processed these card transactions, all ‘RC 09 transactions had been mistakenly settled as profitable.


Following the invention of the glitch, OPay tried to contact prospects who had engaged in transactions exceeding ₦500,000 with out correct debiting.


Regardless of reaching out through cellphone and e-mail, solely about 10% of these contacted have cooperated with OPay to resolve the problem.


In keeping with the corporate’s courtroom submitting, “Whereas some prospects responded positively and cooperated with the Applicant in respect of the restoration of the Erroneously Retained Credit, some prospects have refused, failed, and/or uncared for to fund their accounts to allow the Applicant to deduct the worth of the Erroneously Retained Credit from their respective accounts.”

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.