- Solomon Buchi feedback on the commercialization of gospel music in Nigeria, highlighting ongoing debates inside the Christian neighborhood.
- The dialogue was triggered by Pastor Femi Lazarus, who criticized gospel artists for charging efficiency charges.

Social commentator Solomon Buchi has shared his perspective on the continued dialogue surrounding the commercialization of gospel music in Nigeria, a debate that has just lately sparked controversy inside the Christian neighborhood.
His remarks comply with a dispute ignited by Pastor Femi Lazarus, who criticized gospel artists for charging efficiency charges. In response, well-known gospel singer Timi Dakolo defended the follow, emphasizing the {financial} commitments musicians make—reminiscent of studio production, advertising, and distribution. Dakolo additionally questioned why church buildings readily put money into areas like infrastructure and clergy salaries however usually count on musicians to carry out free of charge.
Including to the discourse, Buchi expressed the view that gospel music must be seen both as a service or a enterprise somewhat than strictly a ministry. He inspired artists to discover a number of income streams, reminiscent of working as session musicians or songwriters, somewhat than relying solely on efficiency charges.
His stance has drawn combined reactions, with some Nigerians supporting his argument whereas others insist that gospel music stays a religious calling somewhat than a industrial enterprise.
See the submit right here;
He went on to recommend the gospel can proceed with out his music. In his phrases,
“Church numbers would drop if we yanked off ‘good music’ from most fashionable Pentecostal church buildings; take off the guitars, pianos, drums and strip it all the way down to only a worship chief and a congregational choir. Now we have made an idol of music, thus, making music ministry a necessary catastrophe.”
“It’s simple to agree that gospel music ministry is vastly compromised. They compete for awards “greatest worship track of the 12 months”; they chase Spotify and Apple streams and find yourself copying world sounds and tendencies to provide marketable songs solely for revenue, and so they cost for his or her ministrations.”
See some feedback under:
@oadefisayo;”Cool! There have been music ministers within the Bible although. Asaph was one.”
“Why ought to a Pastor go away his church choristers to go rent another person and count on free companies? Use your choristers. Respect those you’ve. We a lot like to import. The second you’re requesting for the companies of a employed individual, then don’t complain of the payment”
@bjroyale;”This submit must be archived. It is a clear opinion from the Bible and never man’s opinion. I keep in mind Pastor Chris Oyakhilome mentioned this 12 months’s again. It’s certainly a get up name for Christians. We don’t commercialize the gospel. Thanks for this brother. The problem, as rightly famous, is after we began commercializing music”
@FojoBass;”This dialog is a really nuanced one, and you may’t simply say one occasion is improper the opposite is true. Your conclusion that music ministry is just like different unitsin church is faulty.”
@BinalayefaG;”If the church buildings don’t patronize them we received’t have all these points. It is sort of a lion being feed and now needs to eat up his proprietor. Church buildings will nonetheless invite and pay large quantity and nonetheless come to complain. So to me there’s nothing to speak about regarding this situation.”
@emediong_eric;”This isn’t a controversial take such as you mentioned. It’s the plain reality and it solely appears controversial as a result of the “lie” grew to become the norm.”
@Ajiboyeadeola3;”See Wetin our gospel musicians don trigger 🤣”
@oge_hub;”True, music has turn out to be an idol among the many Pentecostal.”